|
This
month we showcase a game by Junior Tay of Singapore, who by scored
six points out of eight for the North American Pacific Zone (NAPZ)
team in the Interzonal 2000 match. With this fine result against
an all IM field, he attained his second IM norm. Junior Tay is 31
years old and works as a primary school teacher.
He is married to Yip Fong Ling who is also a very strong chess
player. She has won the National Ladies Championship 3 times
and has represented Singapore in the ‘92 Manila and the ‘96 Moscow
Olympiads. She even held Karpov to a draw in a 20 board simultaneous
when Karpov was still FIDE World Champion. So you can see
that this is a serious chess family!
In addition to Junior Tay’s chess activities, he also enjoys reading,
especially all types of fiction novels. In his “younger” days
he used to play various racket sports such as squash, table-tennis,
and badminton, but now his “sporting” activities are restricted
to pushing wooden pieces around a checkered board and clicking the
PC mouse.
Although Junior Tay has known the rules of chess since
childhood, he only began playing serious OTB chess when he was 16
years old. His first competition occurred in 1986 at the National
Youth Championships where he started well with 3 consecutive wins,
but as he recalls “I was later brought down to earth by several
National Junior players and finished with 50%.” Encouraged,
he began studying openings and has progressed ever since.
By 1990 he had made significant progress so
that he finished 2nd in the Serangoon Gardens Allegro tournament
and has managed to make the prize list in every subsequent local
tournament he took part in. 1992 was a great year.
He met his future wife to be, captured 1st place in the National
Rapid Chess Championship, and then scored 5.5 out of 9 in the Commonwealth
Championships held in Malaysia (just behind a slew of UK GMs such
as McNabb, Conquest, Miles, etc. and several IMs). In ‘95,
Junior Tay played for Singapore in the Asian Team Championships,
and was also the Bulletin Commentator and Editor. In the final
round he beat IM Boris Katalymov of Kazakstan and received
the ASEAN silver medal for Board 4. The following year, he
tied for 1st in the biggest local event, the Cairnhill Open Championships.
After starting work as a primary school teacher,
there was less time for OTB chess. Nevertheless, he coached chess
and his young trainees emerged 2nd in the National Under-12 team
championships and later went on to win the National Under-16 team
championships 3 years later. He also took a serious interest
into chess writing contributing articles to the Singapore Chess
Digest and eventually, in ‘97-‘98, becoming the editor of the magazine.
Junior Tay relates his beginnings in ICCF
play in the following way. “Since ‘96 SIM Wang Mong Lin had been
asking me to consider playing CC. After becoming frustrated playing
senseless time trouble wood-pushing in countless local rapid chess
tournaments, I seriously considered taking up CC. The final inspiration
to play CC came when Wang gave me several Chess Mail magazines,
in particular the issue which featured Ulf Andersson’s amazing win
over the current CC World Champion Gert-Jan Timmerman.” That
was the final temptation that started his CC career.
During this short time span he achieved various
successes. Playing Board 3 in the ICCF E-mail Team Championship
Final, he finished third with 5/8 points. He won EM/M/A071 and qualified
for the Email WC Semifinal. He made his first IM norm in the
EM/MN/021 and was invited to play Board 7 for the NAPZ in the Interzonals
2000 match. As he recalls “All of my opponents were
IMs. I really played my heart out in this event. After
the smoke had cleared, I finished with 6/8 surpassing the IM norm
by a point.” Presently he is inclined towards CC journalism
writing extensively for CCN and is cutting down on his CC play.
Anyone that is interested in learning more about Singapore Chess,
can check out his website at http://geocities.com/juniortay/
The featured game is Junior Tay’s win against Christov in the
Interzonals 2000 match. He considers this game as his best
positional CC game thus far. The game begins as a Sicilian,
but takes on the pawn structure more typical of the French defence.
The game illustrates all of the key ideas and dangers in playing
this type of position: being careful about castling too early
for Black, fighting for control of the only open file, and the merits/dangers
of advancing the King side pawns when not adequately prepared.
The game analysis and comments in the brackets […] are those of
Junior Tay. I have included several additional comments that
are denoted by VVP.
|
IM Ilia Christov (Europe2) (2466) - Junior Tay (NAPZ) (2413) [B22]
ICCF Interzonals 2000 Board 7 Singapore, 28.04.2001 |
|
1.e4 c5 2.c3 Nf6 3.e5 Nd5 4.Nf3 e6 5.d4 cxd4 6.cxd4 b6 7.Bc4!?
|
|
[Not a very popular line. A year ago, I faced this
variation and got a bad opening against Ed Limayo.
7.Nc3 is the
main line]
|
|
7...Bb7 8.0–0
|
|
[Now to change direction from the game Limayo-Tay (ICCF EM?M/A071)
which continued 8....Na6!? 9.Bg5! with a slight plus for White.]
|
|
8...d6! 9.Bxd5 Bxd5 10.Nc3 Bxf3 11.Qxf3
d5=
|
|
|
|
[This variation is not very promising for White. Black has traded
off his bad "French" bishop and a pair of Knights, so
he has a structural plus. White however, does have a lead in development.
The semi-closed nature of this position would mean this factor is
not so crucial.]
|
| 12.Qg4 |
| [12.Bg5 Qd7 13.Rac1 Nc6 14.Rfd1 Be7 15.Nb5 0–0 16.Bf6
Nxe5 17.dxe5 Bxf6 18.exf6 Qxb5 19.Qg4 g6 20.Qf4 Kh8 21.Qh6 Rg8 22.Rc7
Qe2 23.Rdc1 Raf8 24.Qg5 d4 25.h3 Qxb2 26.Rd7 e5 27.Rcc7 Qxa2 28.Qxe5
d3 29.Kh2 d2 30.Qd4 Qe6 31.Rd6 Qf5 32.Qd3 Qe5+ 33.Kh1 ˝–˝ McDonald,N-Annakov,B/Hastings
ENG 2000/The Week in Chess 273 (33)] |
| 12...Nc6 13.Be3 Qd7 14.f4 h5 |
| [Of course, f4-f5 cannot be allowed. ] |
| 15.Qe2 g6 16.Rac1 Be7 17.Qb5 |
| White doesn't have any realistic chances on the Kingside
unless Black castles there. So, he attempts to put pressure on the
c-file. VVP |
| 17...Rc8 18.Rf2 Na5!N
|
|

|
| [Up till now, Christov had been following the
game Kleinert-Volkac. White was hoping for 18...0–0 19.Rfc2! with
the forced win of a pawn, which Kleinert missed! With 18...Na5
I offered him a queen trade as well as bring my Knight to the excellent
c4 square.] [18...0–0 19.Rfc2! (19.Rcf1?! Rfd8 20.Qe2 Bb4 21.Nd1 Bf8
22.g4 hxg4 23.Qxg4 Ne7 24.h4 Nf5 25.h5 Kg7 26.Rh2 Be7 27.Rg2 Rh8 28.hxg6
Rh4 29.Qe2 fxg6 30.Kf2 Rch8 31.Ke1 Rh3 32.Rfg1 R3h6 33.Kf1 Kf7 34.Nf2
Qa4 35.b3 Qc6 36.Ng4 Rh3 37.Bf2 Qc1+ 38.Qe1 Qxf4 39.Qd1 Rc8 40.Ke2
Qf3+ 0–1 Kleinert,J-Vokac,M/Prague 1989/EXT 97 (40)) 19...Rc7 (19...Qe8
20.Nxd5+-; 19...a6 20.Qxb6 Nb4 21.Rd2+-) 20.Nxd5! exd5 21.Rxc6+-]
|
| 19.Qe2 Nc4 20.b3?! |
| [I don't like this move because
it gives away a key Queenside square on c2 which prevents White from
doubling on the c file. Moreover, the Queenside dark squares are unnecessarily
weakened. In any case, Black welcomes a Rook trade as the difference
in the Bishops would become more telling.] It would have been
better to play 20.Qd3 or Qf3 followed by 21.Rf-c2. Then White would
be able to contest the c-file.
After 20.b3 Na3, this maneuver will not be possible. VVP |
| 20...Na3 21.g3 |
| Preparing for h3 and g4, with an eventual f5, would
be fine if Black had castled.
But, this plan is slow and Black's King is quite safe in the
center. VVP |
| 21...b5 22.Rff1 Qb7 |
| [Bad would be 22...0–0? as 23.f5! would lead to 23...exf5
24.Qf3 Rcd8 (24...Rfd8 25.Nxd5±) 25.Ne2! intending Nf4 with
Nxh5, e5-e6, Nxd5 attacking ideas.] |
| 23.h3 Kd7! |
|

|
| [Now the point of b5 and Qb7 is revealed. Black completes
development without providing White with a Kingside target. Now, White
has no good incentive to aim for the g3-g4, f4-f5 pawn breaks without
a target. ] |
| 24.Kg2 Rc6 25.Nb1 |
| [VVP. White losses patience with the Knight on a3 and
decides to exchange it. But having the bishop on a3 will be even more
painful. It would have
been better to bring the bishop back into the game via Bd2. For example
25.Bd2 Rhc8 26.Qd3 a6 27.Ne2 Rc2 (27...b4 28.Rxc6 Qxc6 29.Rc1 Qb5
30.Qxb5+ Nxb5 31.Rxc8 Kxc8 32.g4) 28.Rxc2 Rxc2 29.Rc1= (29.Rc1
Rxa2 30.Nc3 Rb2 31.Nd1) |
| 25...Nxb1 26.Rxb1 |
| [26.Rxc6 Qxc6 27.Rxb1 Ba3µ] |
| 26...Rhc8 27.Rbc1 Ba3 28.Rxc6
Qxc6 |
| [Normally, one would prefer the Rook to be in front
of the Queen when doubling but in this case, there is a tactical refutation.
28...Rxc6 29.f5! exf5 30.g4! Suddenly, it's the Black king that feels
insecure!] |
| 29.Bd2 a6 30.Ba5?
|
| [White logically tries to get his Bishop to work on
some dark squares. However, this move fails tactically...] |
| 30...Be7! |
| [Attempting to trap the Ba5 with b5-b4.
Black also introduces the threat of h5-h4, weakening the White
Kingside.] [30...Qc2 31.Qxc2 Rxc2+ 32.Rf2 Rc1 33.Bd2 Rd1 34.Bc3] |
| 31.Qd2 h4! |
| [This looks like a patzer move, because now f4-f5 looks
like it will pose an extremely serious threat to Black's King.] |
| 32.g4? |
| [White obliges...but this is the losing move! The weakening
of the g3 square is the point of h5-h4 and White will pay dearly for
it. 32.Rf2 is the
only move, but Black still has a clear advantage after 32...hxg3 33.Kxg3
Qc1 34.Qxc1 Rxc1 35.Bd2 Rd1. Then Black can push b5-b4, walk his King
to b5, and push a5-a4 creating a 3rd weakness (besides d4 and h3)
on b3 or a2.] |
| 32...b4! |
|

|
| [Snap! And the trap shuts. In order to free the errant
Bishop, White must relinquish control of the 2nd and 3d ranks and
the Black Queen gets to mop up the Kingside pawns.] |
| 33.Bxb4 |
| [33.Qd3 Rb8–+] |
| 33...Bxb4 34.Qxb4 Qc2+ 35.Kg1 |
| [35.Rf2 Qd3 36.Qa4+ Ke7 37.Qb4+ Ke8 38.Qa4+ (38.Qd2
Qg3+ 39.Kf1 Qxh3+ 40.Kg1 Qxg4+ 41.Rg2 Qf3–+) 38...Kf8 And the
Black king finds sanctuary on g7.] |
| 35...Qd3 |
| [Upon finding no way to rescue his Kingside pawns as
well as preventing the invasion of the Black rook, Christov resigned.][35...Qd3
36.Qe1 Rc2–+ 37.g5 (37.Qxh4 Qxd4+ 38.Kh1 Qe4+ 39.Kg1 Qg2#) 37...Qxh3
38.Rf2 Qg3+ 39.Kf1 Qd3+ 40.Kg1 Qxd4–+] |
| 0–1 |
| A fine positional game by Junior Tay. |